Gary Bennett

The Latest Pandemic: We Refuse to Learn What History Teaches

By Gary Bennett

3D illustration of Coronavirus, virus which causes SARS and MERS, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome

Will we ever learn?

Epidemics, plagues and pandemics have been around since the dawn of time. But over and over, government response has fallen heartbreakingly short. Indeed, keeping its citizens safe from enemies foreign and domestic is the main reason we have government in the first place. But when it comes to disease, governments more often than not downplay the threat posed by this insidious enemy.

Don’t be fooled by the flurry of governmental activity happening now surrounding the outbreak of COVID-19. Daily announcements of more and more drastic measures to mitigate spread of this disease don’t change the fact that we are frantically trying to play catch up. It didn’t have to be this way.

Back on January 22^nd President Trump was asked if he was worried about a coming pandemic based upon what was happening in China. Trump responded, “No. Not at all. We have it totally under control. It’s one person coming in from China. It’s going to be just fine.” Even if you discount his penchant for looking at everything through a political lens and his seemingly intrinsic need to sound authoritative on a topic he obviously knows little about, his carefree stance was horrifying. He held to this position for several precious weeks when we could have been preparing. That point should not be lost. Presidents must measure their words carefully and land on the side of caution, but those are behaviors this president doesn’t much care for.

No president can know everything of course, and we can’t blame them for that. That’s why we have experts in government advising the president on technical and scientific matters regularly. Except in this case we didn’t until very recently.

A week before Trump’s inauguration in January 2017, Obama’s homeland security advisor briefed his incoming counterpart on pandemic threats and how to respond to them based on the previous administration’s response to outbreaks of swine flu, Ebola, and Zika. The briefing covered limits to international travel, compromising of supply chains, tanking of the stock market, overburdening of our health care system, and all framed by the premise that a vaccine would not be ready for many months—the same situation we are in today. Falling on deaf ears, National Security Advisor John Bolton eventually shut down the National Security Council’s unit for preparing and responding to pandemics. Then, the new administration’s official in charge of spearheading responses to infectious threats quit and was not replaced. We should not forget that both actions egregiously inhibited our initial national response to COVID-19.

It is no secret—unless you are perpetually affixed to Fox News—that this administration’s response to the latest pandemic has been woefully inadequate, especially in the beginning when it would have made all the difference. But unfortunately, this administration is not alone. One only has to look at the two most virulent international pandemics in modern U.S. history. In both cases we had a chance to lead and mitigate the consequences but fell woefully short: the HIV/AIDS pandemic of 1981 and Spanish flu pandemic of 1918.

In 1981 Ronald Regan (R) was in the White House. When the HIV/AIDS epidemic hit, the Reagan administration’s first reaction was to treat it as a joke. In a new documentary short called When AIDS Was Funny, posted by Vanity Fair, audio of press conferences reveals Ronald Reagan’s press secretary, Larry Speakes, joking about the now well-known HIV/AIDS epidemic and assuring the country that Reagan was doing nothing about it, nor should he be. The administration assured America that the disease could only be slowed by ethical behavior that could not be legislated. The perpetrators of the disease – gay men – would realize this and adopt proper lifestyle changes eventually. How terribly shortsighted this policy was.

History shows this inaction was an undeniable stain on the Reagan presidency. It took deaths by celebrities like Rock Hudson, deaths of thousands of heterosexual Americans, and deaths due to transfusions from tainted blood by children like Ryan White to change Reagan’s mind and get him moving. By the time he finally addressed the crisis in earnest in 1987 – six years after its discovery – 23,000 Americans had died from the disease. To date, 35 million people have died from HIV/AIDS and its complications worldwide. How many would have been spared with more timely, thoughtful and decisive action by the U.S. president, one who did not pander to his yuck-it-up base?

In 1918 the U.S. government badly handled the Spanish flu pandemic, responding to it much as the current administration has to COVID-19. Woodrow Wilson (D) was in the middle of his second term as president. World War I was raging in Europe but prospects of an armistice were growing day by day. When the Spanish flu hit first in New York with a deadliness that few had ever seen, officials downplayed the threat. They were more concerned with keeping up morale for the war effort. That decision proved disastrous. As more deaths occurred, panic spread and people distrusted the government more and more. Americans witnessed scenes reminiscent of the European Black Death they had heard about from stories passed down from their grandparents.

Amazingly, Wilson never released a public statement on the pandemic. Surgeon General Rupert Blue said, “There is no cause for alarm if proper precautions are observed.” Another top health official dismissed it as “ordinary influenza by another name.” Of course, it was not. Spanish flu had a mortality rate of 2 percent — much higher than seasonal influenza strains, and similar to some early estimates about COVID-19. By 1942 when a vaccine was finally licensed, 675,000 Americans had died and over 50 million worldwide,

In a chilling parallel to today, if a newspaper reported the truth, the government threatened it. The Jefferson County Union in Wisconsin warned about the seriousness of Spanish flu on Sept. 27, 1918. Within days, an Army general began prosecution against the paper under a wartime sedition act, claiming it had “depressed morale.” In an ironic twist of fate, President Wilson even contracted the disease, only to eventually recover and be felled by a stroke a few months later. Historians agree that his months-long recuperation from Spanish flu hurt negotiations to end World War I.

We will get through the COVID-19 pandemic like we have all the others. People will suffer and many will die, but this is not the end of the world. Most biblical scholars can assure you of that. We can only hope that this and future administrations will finally learn the lessons that history tries to teach us over and over again: take it seriously and prepare as soon as possible. As soon as we recover from this disaster, we must insist that government prepare for the next one, which is sure to come. Politicians must listen.

FSK Lions Step in to Provide Medical Equipment

By Gary Bennett

Ellen Bennett displays medical equipment available for lending through the FSK Lions Club.

As seen in the Frederick News-Post Feb. 19, 2020.

In August, 2019 when Frederick nonprofit Federated Charities announced their intention of shuttering their free used medical equipment program (Local Lions Clubs fill void, July 11, 2019), Francis Scott Key Lions Club knew they had to help.

“With a motto of ‘we serve’, there was never a question of our club not stepping up and helping out,” said Gary Bennett, an FSK Lions Club member who took notice of Federated Charities announcement in the News-Post and took it upon himself to make something happen. “This is a needed program that just had to continue in some shape or form.”

As the July 11 news article reported, several other Lions Clubs in the county and surrounding area also provide free medical equipment to all who ask, but none of the three clubs serving the greater Frederick area had participated to this point.

“The need is there,” according to Gary’s wife Ellen Bennett, who is a retired hospice and long-term care nurse and fellow Lion. “Many folks in our community just can’t afford the medical equipment they need, and they fall through the cracks because their health insurance won’t cover this needed equipment. We’ll lend it for free.” Ellen Bennett will serve as volunteer program manager for the FSK Lions program.

“We will serve as a conduit for those with medical equipment to share to get it into the hands of those who need it. It’s really not much different from a lending library,” said Ellen. We will ensure that all equipment is clean, disinfected, and in good working order when it is picked up.

The FSK used medical equipment program will provide wheelchairs, knee scooters, walkers, rollators, bedside commodes, shower chairs, crutches and canes. Those with equipment no longer needed can contact the Bennetts through the regional Lions Clubs website at https://mdlions22w.org/. Just find the tab “Medical Equipment” and then FSK Lions Club. Citizens needing equipment can use the same web address to get help.

Other Lions Clubs serving the immediate area with used medical equipment include Boonsboro, Funkstown, Hagerstown, Libertytown/Unionville, Mount Airy, New Windsor, Smithsburg, Taneytown, Union Bridge, Williamsport, and more. Potential clients are encouraged to contact the Lions Club closest to them.

For the time being, the FSK program will operate out of Gary and Ellen Bennett’s garage in the Ballenger Creek area. “Trying to find an appropriate and permanent home for such a needed program is more difficult that you might imagine,” according to Gary. “I’ve contacted numerous storage facilities and other likely targets such as other nonprofits to no avail,” said Gary. “I know the Frederick community wants to help so if any of your readers know of a facility or can provide one of their own, we would like to hear about it. We need about 300 square feet. We don’t mind giving up our garage for such a worthy cause, but it’s not a good long-term solution for us or the Lions.”

Indeed, finding an appropriate storage facility for the medical equipment is what has caused many Lions Clubs, including the Frederick and Yellow Springs clubs, to not participate. “Lions Clubs serving smaller communities that tend to have their own buildings are more able to provide a service like this,” said FSK Lions Club president Duane Voitel. “We are proud of the Bennetts for stepping up but we need the community to also help us. We don’t mind putting in the volunteer hours to coordinate something like this, but we just don’t have the funds or land to sit our own storage facility on. We’d certainly like to have something more centrally located in downtown Frederick so we can best serve the folks who need it the most. The International Lions Club does provide its own insurance.”

According to Gary Bennett, anyone needing equipment can contact them through the FSK Lions club and have it the next day. Recipients are expected to pick up the equipment themselves, but in certain situations, the Lions can help with that, too. Recipients can use the equipment for as long as they need but are expected to eventually return it so the Lions can lend it again.

“Elin Ross with Federated Charities has been invaluable in helping us set up this program,” said Gary. “They’ve provided valuable consultation and advice and a waiver document that we are using. We’d also like to thank Jim Ensor with the Libertytown/Unionville Lions Club and Dennis Ahalt with the Mount Airy Lions Club for helping us build our inventory and Frederick’s Senior Services Division and Frederick Health Hospice who are helping to spread the word about this program.”

Recently celebrating in 60^th anniversary, Francis Scott Key Lions Club has been serving the Frederick Community since 1959. They support a number of local, national and international charities and service projects including vision screenings for children in Head Start, daycare, private and afterschool programs, providing Leader Dogs to blind and low-sight individuals, and providing eyeglasses to those in need. They are part of Lions Clubs International, the world’s largest service club organization with over 1.45 million members in over 200 countries. If interested in joining FSK Lions Club, contact info@fsklions.org, www.fsklions.org, (240) 626-1511 or attend one of our biweekly meetings the second or fourth Tuesday of each month at Capital Crave and Frederick VFW on the Golden Mile. Dinner is at 6:00 pm and meeting at 6:30 pm.

Look Out, Virginia — There’s a New Sheriff in Town and She Doesn’t Much Like Guns

By Gary Bennett

It never ceases to amaze me how much gun owners care about their guns.

When I try to think of something that I enjoy so much that if it were curtailed in any way, I would take off for the state capital with my compatriots to lodge a protest, I come up empty. But that is exactly what gun rights supporters did in Richmond on January 20 – Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, no less.

You certainly have to give them credit. What the gun rights supporters did in Richmond was undeniably impressive. Over 20,000 made their way to the Virginia state capital from all over the country to voice their displeasure with the gun safety measures working their way through the newly Democrat-controlled legislature. That is democracy at its best.

But why did so many have to ruin it by dressing up in fatigues and carrying their pistols on their hips and long guns across their chests? This unfortunate attempt at intimidation and bullying took away from what was otherwise a sound message: please don’t infringe upon our constitutional right to keep and bear arms.

Despite organizers’ pleas for demonstrators to wear regular clothes so as to not appear to be gun-crazy lunatics, I’m afraid that is exactly what happened. The temptation to put on a menacing show proved too great. Thank goodness the other side stayed away, focusing instead on working the phones to promote their point of view. One could easily imagine another Charlottesville had the two sides been toe to toe in Richmond. And kudos to the state police who proactively rounded up three American terrorists bent on doing harm at the protest.

Of course, 20,000 protesters pale in comparison to 2.4 million Virginians who voted in large part for increased gun safety in the 2019 state election, thereby flipping the legislature blue. The new silent majority in Virginia spoke and spoke loudly: there is a new sheriff in town and you’ll now be checking your guns at the door.

Virginia’s Republican-controlled legislature made a mockery of the governor’s call last fall to discuss gun safety in a special session by ending the proceedings in 90 minutes. Students of government and history could easily see the blue wave coming after that happened. Voters in the middle on both sides tend not to put up with dereliction of duty like this, and they didn’t.

You can say that the rich treasure trove of progressive voters in Northern Virginia overwhelmed the rest of the state, and you would be partially right, but the truth is the blue wave hit all parts of the state. Anyway, aren’t Northern Virginians are just as much Virginians as those in the rural western parts of the state? How sad that many on the right called for Northern Virginia to be annexed into Washington, DC because of this change in political fortune.

There has also been a rush of over 110 communities in rural Virginia to declare themselves Second Amendment sanctuaries. A few counties even entertained the idea of leaving the state for the greener pastures of gun-loving, ruby red West Virginia, which is surprisingly constitutional. These developments were funny but sad at the same time.

Having their community declared a Second Amendment sanctuary may make gun enthusiasts feel better, but such a declaration has no force of law, just like declaring a city an immigration sanctuary has no force of law. It is a waste of time and confuses people into thinking they can ignore gun laws coming out of Richmond. Nothing could be further from the truth and some people will unfortunately find out the hard way.

Besides the “I want it my way or I’m leaving” mentality, what bothers me most about many gun owners is that they only see the perceived infringement of their own rights. What about the rights of the rest of us to feel safe in our communities? What about the families torn apart by gun violence?

We know you are not the perpetrators, but most gun owners never seem to offer any solutions or seem willing to even join in the discussion. It would be so refreshing to hear gun owners say, “Hey, they’re right. This is our responsibility. We have to do something. We can’t go on this way.” Sadly, that never happens. No, they are happy to blame mental illness, ignoring the fact that only 23 percent of shooters have such a diagnosis according to the CDC. So, please see this political ploy for what it is: deflection. Once the furor of the latest bout of gun violence dies down, meaningful mental health system reform is quickly forgotten and on we move.

There is no doubt this new political reality must be very unsettling to rural Virginians. I lived in rural Southwestern Virginia for many years before moving to Frederick in 1988 so I get that. Gun ownership and sportsmanship is a way of life. I think most reasonable people understand and appreciate that. The good news is that no one is coming to take away Virginians’ guns. That is a scare tactic. Don’t fall for it. No mainstream politician is even suggesting such a thing. Even if they did, it would be impossible to implement. What do gun owners think – that a small band of FBI agents or state police officers will descend on their communities house by house to confiscate guns? Please.

Let’s be equally clear that regulation is not infringement. The Second Amendment says the right of the people to keep and bear arms “shall not be infringed,” not that it “shall not be regulated.” Even the first four words of the amendment “a well-regulated militia” demands regulation. The Supreme Court has upheld the Second Amendment as pertaining to ordinary citizens (“the people”) and not state national guards as many will argue, but that doesn’t make the Second Amendment absolute. None of our rights are absolute. The courts have upheld time and again that all amendments are subject to reasonable regulation.

As much as I might like to, I can’t make up and publish vicious lies about my worst enemy designed to harm their name without risking dire consequences. Free speech is regulated but that doesn’t infringe upon my right to exercise it reasonably. Likewise, requiring some training before a person can carry a concealed weapon, requiring a universal background check before any gun can be purchased, and limiting handgun purchases to one a month (who are these people?) infringes on no one’s right to bear arms.

The NRA has done a wildly successful job of convincing gun owners that if you give just a little bit, the government will come back for more. History shows time and again that is not the case. Once the party in power gets what they initially want, they back off and move on to other things. The rash of gun regulations now making their way through the Virginia legislature is due to pent up demand and the suicidal policy of the last legislature to not consider any gun regulation whatsoever. That is not where most Virginians are. If the previous legislature had governed from the middle-right on gun regulation instead of the hard right, I believe they would still be in power. I also believe the Democrats are making the same mistake right now from the left. They are pushing for too much, too quickly. Republicans will have an excellent opportunity to make this case to voters later this year. We are a 50/50 country and Virginia is a 50/50 state that changes legislatures every single year. When will we learn to govern that way?

This may come as a surprise to many and the fanatics will deny it but most gun owners support reasonable regulation. A recent NPR-PBS Newshour-Marist poll shows that 89 percent of Americans support enhanced background checks, including 84 percent of Republicans. And, according to a Fox News poll, two-thirds of Americans support an assault weapons ban and nearly three-fourths support a national “red flag” law. Yes, Fox News.

Unfortunately, you will hear the exact opposite from the NRA. The NRA claims 5 million members, but as a former association executive, I can assure you that number is probably inflated. Even if it is not, there are 80 million American gun owners. To say the NRA represents the gun-owning public is absolutely wrong and proven in national poll after national poll that examines gun issues. So please, don’t be taken in by their propaganda. We can have our guns and regulate them, too.

Gary Bennett is a political scientist, historian, and freelance writer living in Frederick, MD.

Thank you, Democrats

By Gary Bennett

As seen in the Frederick News Post, Saturday, January 4, 2020.

Thank you for doing your job.

Especially to the House Democrats in Republican-leaning districts who could have easily abstained or voted not to impeach, knowing that more than enough votes were already available. That is the kind of courage, conscientiousness and placing the country before party we need out of Congress but is sorely lacking. Some may be risking their seats but did their duty anyway. The country voted overwhelmingly for Congressional oversight of the president in the 2018 midterms – even in many Trump districts – and that’s exactly what we’ve gotten. Elections have consequences after all, as many Trump supporters are fond of saying. You can be sure that reasonable Republicans are afraid for their country and are glad to hide behind Congressional oversight from the Democrats and demonize them anyone. Kind of the best of both worlds!

And thank goodness for this new-found oversight. Under a Republican House, do you think Mr. Trump’s wrongdoing would never have seen the light of day? And, it doesn’t even matter that Mr. Trump won’t be removed from office. The Senate Republicans who privately loathe Mr. Trump will not bring themselves to do that, of course. Call me naive, but I believe in his heart of hearts, Mr. Trump knows he is dodging a bullet and will no longer seek foreign help for his 2020 political prospects. A win for all of us!

But Senate Republicans had better be careful. Many Americans will not put up with a sham trial. Just ask Virginia Republicans who made a mockery of a special session the governor called on gun safety earlier this year. Their dereliction of duty cost them dearly at the polls and I believe the same will happen to Senate Republicans in 2020. For all you Trump supporters who find this entire affair a sordid miscarriage of justice, I have just one question: if a Democratic president had done what Mr. Trump has admitted to doing, would you still feel it is not impeachable? As a Democrat who supported the impeachment of Bill Clinton in 1998 because we cannot permit anyone lying to Congress in this country, I unfortunately already know the answer to that one.

Adventures in Commuting

By Gary Bennett

As seen in The Washington Post, Sunday, December 29, 2019.

“Well, I guess we’re all in this together,“ I said to the woman I was eyeball to eyeball with on Metro. I’ve lived in Frederick for 30 years and worked in the District, Northern Virginia, or Baltimore the entire time.

As a dedicated transit rider, I’m well versed in the sardine effect that takes place on so many Metro trips and the etiquette required to get through them. I’m sure you’ve experienced this, too. Many times I’ve been so uncomfortably close to someone else on Metro all I could do was smile and try to relieve the tension. You can’t just remain silent; that seems wrong. “I feel like I should at least buy you dinner or get your phone number,” I said to one woman older than I. She sighed and agreed. You’d be surprised at the kinship of the downtrodden.

I’ve seen numerous perplexing events during my 30 years of commuting and been party to more than I’d like to admit. There was the time I was asked by a male stranger if I would like to have my portrait done. Now, you don’t get that kind of offer every day but somehow it didn’t seem too unusual on Metro. I didn’t see any paints or photography equipment, but the man did seem to be relatively sane and earnest enough. After some quick calculations though, I politely declined. He moved on to someone else. After I relayed this story to my wife, she assured me that I had been propositioned. The more I think about it, I guess she was right. But then I’ve always been pretty oblivious to matters of the heart.

Occasionally, to get a little exercise, I will walk an extra 10 or 12 blocks to pick up Metro a couple of stops from my usual one. One day it was a little warmer than I thought, and I walked a little faster than I should have, so I got onto Metro a little sweaty and out of breath. Immediately a young woman jumped up and offered me her seat. I’m sure she felt I was a heart attack waiting to happen and wanted no part of that. This was the first time I had ever been offered a seat on Metro, and I took it as a sign that my working days were quickly coming to an end. Flustered, I refused the seat and stood up the rest of the way home — even after she departed and the train was almost empty.

I’ve seen more panhandling, fights, medical emergencies, and proud, loud, singing than I can remember. My most memorable subway person, as I like to call them, would have to be the wayward soul who was proudly relieving himself – complete with oohs and ahhs – on the Twinbrook Metro platform in broad daylight in front of God and everyone. The high arc of his stream was undeniably impressive, and I have to admit that I envied his carefree abandon.

Of course adventurous commuting is not limited to public transportation. You still have to get to the station. I estimate I’ve driven well more than a million miles to and from work in my lifetime and seen and had plenty of fun behind the wheel. I’ve been stuck in countless traffic jams, seen numerous fender benders and worse, and witnessed, but never participated in, terrifying bouts of road rage. I’ve seen other drivers (never me) do everything from reading the paper and shaving to applying a full day’s worth of makeup, and yes, making out with their front seat companion. I’ve even been booed by passing motorists after emerging dazed from an accident that flipped my car over and caused a severe back up.

But my favorite driving foible has to be the one on the back roads of Montgomery County. I’ve always done everything possible to avoid as much of Interstate 270 as I can. That makes me a devotee of southbound Routes 85, 355, and 28. One day, Barnesville Road was closed due to an accident. Drivers were detoured onto West Old Baltimore Road, a pleasant enough country road. After a few miles and much to my dismay I came upon a stream crossing without a bridge. Who knew such things still existed in Montgomery County? It is one of the richest counties in the country; you’d think every stream crossing would have a bridge. I carefully crossed the stream, got to work on time, and thought my grandpa who lived and worked in the mountains of West Virginia would be proud.

Historical Open Letter from President Donald J. Trump

My fellow patriotic Americans (and all you losers without MAGA hats),

I, President Donald John Trump, am sacrificing a bit of my executive time with Fox News today to announce that I hereby resign as your favorite president. It’s been a fun and perfect three years demonizing the lefties, allies, Gold Star Families, and the so-called free press but all good things must come to an end. Just ask my three Secretaries of Defense, three Secretaries of Labor, three Chiefs of Staff, and of course my personal fixer, Michael Cohen, who can be reached in federal prison in upstate New York. I swear I was going to clean up the swamp and appoint the best people but every person I appointed turned out to be a crooked loser.

It has come to pass that I find myself about to be impeached, and as much as I like to be the center of attention, I don’t want to be lumped in with those phonies Bill Clinton and Andrew Jackson, Johnson or whatever his name was. I’d rather dramatically ride off into the sunset on my personal chopper, Marine One. No one’s ever done that before and can you imagine the ratings! Plus, those enemies of the people—the lamestream media, won’t have me to kick around anymore! This I can tell you.

Can you believe it? Me, impeached? The Chosen One! AND, I’M DOING SUCH A GREAT JOB! I guess I shouldn’t be surprised, though. Bill’s economy in 1998 was even better and we were at peace. You saw what they did to him. At least many of the same senators who screwed him have come to see that impeachment is not the way. I’m looking at you Mitch and Lindsey! It is serious business lying about an extramarital affair and getting caught so I guess Slick Willy got what he deserved. Better just to be upfront about it. Hell, if the evangelicals don’t care about extramarital affairs and grabbing female body parts, why would anyone?

A lot of people are saying you just can’t trust those Dems to see things the right way. They’ve made up some malarkey about their congressional oversight duty and impeachment being in the constitution. SAD!!! When I smartly and bravely bring up words like “coup” and “treason”, WHICH IS MY RIGHT, they have the audacity to lie and point out that treason only applies to aiding and abetting a wartime enemy, not criticizing the president, and that coups are things that happen in sh*thole countries at the end of a gun, not in countries like ours that depend on that pesky rule of law. But I feel better now that my thirteen-year old son explained to me that Republicans will still be in charge. I could have sworn those Dem traitors Nervous Nancy and Crooked Hillary would take over. Why else would they do this? What’s in it for them? We all like a good civil war, of course, but if I can’t be Supreme Commander, why bother?

Okay, maybe I should have reported that Russian meddling thing in the 2016 election that I obviously knew about but did nothing to stop. But the Russians were for me and anyone would have taken that meeting. And by the way, I’m not a puppet. Hillary’s the puppet! I fired that giant Lurch Jim Comey to make it all go away and what did that get me? Just more grief and low-energy, sad sack Robert Mueller and his so-called investigation that dragged on for over a year. He had the audacity to not exonerate me and even charge obstruction. But no matter, I just claimed I was cleared and my loyal subjects ate it up. Plus, my fat personal lawyer, I mean Attorney General, Bill Barr, backed me up, too.

And sure, I obviously asked Russia, Ukraine, and China to get some dirt on that scumbag, Joe Biden, and in the case of Ukraine, withheld some military funds until they did but that was my money anyway! And I had to match the Dems before they meddled in the 2020 election by trying to make sure every citizen, especially the Blacks and Hispanics, suburban moms, and manufacturing workers whose jobs never came back, exercised their right to vote. We can’t let low-IQ Joe Biden take over anyway. He’s not smart enough to keep America interesting and on edge by constantly belittling half the population and pitting them against each other. Can you imagine how boring things will be under Sleepy Joe? And his family – what a bunch of losers and hangers-on!

I’d like to take this opportunity to recap our accomplishments over the last three years. We didn’t get much accomplished, okay? Well, other than some tax cuts for the rich, executive orders that will get reversed when the Dems get their chance and of course all those federal judges and Supreme Court justices. Mitch sure pulled a fast one when he prevented the Obama/Clinton gang from having their choice back in 2016. That was my idea, by the way. I don’t know Merrick Garland but I hear he is a nice fellow – just not Supreme Court material like my guy Brett Kavanaugh. With me and Brett, I hope women have at least learned that their hysterical, lying, sexual misconduct charges will get them nowhere. We did have a fun government shutdown and took some money from the Defense Department to start on my beautiful Southern border wall. There are some bad hombres trying to get into this country and I’m proud to say we have slowed them down even without shooting them in the legs, WHICH IS MY RIGHT! If people want into this country so badly, they should just pay their way in at Ellis Island like my grandfather did!

I hope we can count on all those judges Mitch and I are appointing, but you never know. Some of those losers claim independence from their Dear Leader and rely on that pesky rule of law. Just ask that deep state flunky John Roberts who voted to keep the ACA intact even though we were sure to eventually come up with something much better. I did my best, though. I kept ACA underfunded so rates would soar and declined to defend it in court.

To tell you the truth, I wasn’t going to leave in 2020 anyway, no matter what the crooked election said. Probably not in 2024 either as long as my perfect health held up. It is just not possible for me to be voted out after all that I have done for this country! You may have heard that I took a pay cut to be your leader. No, as a stable genius and with more military knowledge that all those generals of mine combined, there is no way I could be removed from the White House. But just think of all the fun we will be missing in January 2021 when that stiff Mike Pence has to turn over the keys to Sleepy Joe. Wouldn’t you have rather had me up there saying “I don’t think so, Joe.” My people were already working on that speech.

But, in my great and unmatched wisdom, I’ve come to the conclusion that you just don’t deserve me. That’s why I’m walking way. What’s next for me, you ask? I have three words for you – Trump News Network. That’s right, we’ll finally have media we can trust. I’ll be the only correspondent of course because why would I share air time with anyone else if I don’t have to? Once I became my own press secretary things went much better, don’t you think? Even those ingrates at Fox News were starting to turn on me. They were starting to ask some pushy questions and not doing the job they were paid to do. The last thing I’ll do before I go is remove the Fox News line item from the Republican National Committee budget. That’ll teach them.

So, it is with a full heart, terrific hair and tan, and smokin’ hot daughter and wife that I bid you farewell. Try to get along without me for a while. I said this before that foreign loser Arnold What’s-his-name did – I’ll BE BACK, which is my right.

Don’t worry about me, MAGA friends. I’ve already pardoned myself. Just waiting on that superb ass kisser Mike Pence to read it later.

Gary Bennett writes from an alternate universe where everyone, including President Trump, has come to their senses.

Political Unkindness–How We Got Here and What We Can Do

By Gary Bennett

Of course it had to happen this way. The impeachment hearings kicked off on the same week as World Kindness Day. I’m ashamed to say that I had never heard of World Kindness Day. It goes back to 1998 and is devoted to small and large acts of kindness. How quaint in this day and age, right?

It’s difficult to think of anything less kind than these impeachment hearings. Depending on your point of view, the hearings are either a desperate witch hunt to overturn the results of the 2016 presidential election or a sober, constitutional investigation of reported abuses of power by the president. Democrats and Republicans are pitted against each other in a death struggle of epic proportions—not so much in a search for truth but rather to see who can come out on top. It’s always about the politics now. For this impeachment go-round—they happen about every 20 years now—Democrats control the hearings and have positioned themselves as the agents of truth. Republicans are left to mostly attack the process and rail against the public servants who are providing the testimony.

The country went through the same experience in 1998 but roles were completely reversed. Republicans held the House and controlled the hearings. They went on to impeach President Clinton for obstruction of justice—lying to Congress about his sexual escapades in the White House. The Democrats were left to complain about a witch hunt and unfairness to the president. My how things come around! Clinton was later acquitted in the Senate just as President Trump will be acquitted.

In 1973 when the Nixon impeachment hearings were dominating TV, things were much different. Politicians and the American people seemed to be more open minded. There were such things as moderate and liberal Republicans and conservative Democrats. Those species have gone the way of the dodo bird, of course. There was no witch’s brew of smirking talking heads on TV and, of course, no Internet. President Nixon was pushed by his FELLOW REPUBLICANS to resign rather than face certain impeachment and conviction. That has as much chance of happening today as a cold front settling over Hades.

I can’t help wondering where it all went so wrong. When did party start coming before country? Why can’t politicians, and more importantly Americans, with different life outlooks trust each other more and show at least a modicum of kindness towards each other? There are many first-hand accounts of U.S. senators being very accommodating and kind to each other behind closed doors. It’s a small, exclusive club after all. But when the cameras start rolling you can forget all that. A politician can’t appear to be a compromiser and not a fighter. I wonder how they sleep at night sometimes. Does this all mean that we are the problem? Are politicians simply playing a part that we demand? I don’t know, but I do know this ugly phenomenon took a turn for the worse about 30 years ago.

I believe the election of Bill Clinton in 1992 jump started the unkindness era. James Monroe ushered in the Era of Good Feelings after the War of 1812. Clinton gets to own the start of this new era. Back then a lot of people saw him for what he was and said so—a purely political animal, sometimes unscrupulous, a little too slick, and a well-known womanizer. He wasn’t highly respected, and like Mr. Trump, was elected by a minority of Americans. It also didn’t help that this baby boomer, small-state Southern governor defeated a highly respected war hero from the Greatest Generation. George H.W. Bush adroitly guided America through the first Gulf War but was undone by courageously bucking his own party by raising taxes when most economists agreed they needed to be raised. He would have even survived that had he not welched on his “read my lips—no new taxes” pledge. Just like Nixon, Republicans turned on him. It also didn’t help that the country went into a recession in 1992. Mr. Clinton represented the possibility of an improving economy so we took a flyer on him. Thankfully, he and the economy improved enough to drive his reelection in 1996.

So if you think the never-ending criticism of President Trump is unprecedented, you’d be sadly mistaken. Presidents Clinton, the second Bush, and Obama all faced withering pockets of what can only be called hatred. The only new thing now is that the current president hates many of us right back. He gleefully insults and demonizes his detractors and is unconcerned with being presidential and rising above it all. His fans eat it up. I vividly remember the presidencies of Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan and all the rest. To my eyes and ears, none faced the vitriol that has been hurled at the last four.

Another stake in the heart of kindness is the rise of the so-called news channels with a point of view. Many forget that Fox News and MSNBC did not exist until relatively recently. We had CNN back in the day, and believe it or not, it was seen as a trusted, middle of the road provider of straight news. In fact, I’m not sure the first George Bush could have led American and the world through the first Gulf War without CNN. Today, Americans, for better or worse, can get their news delivered through a prism of like-minded talking heads who make no pretense at bi- or nonpartisanship. I think it’s far worse.

Another factor is the culture war. Up until the 90’s and Clinton, divisive cultural issues did not play an unnaturally large role in national politics. Sure, there was vigorous debate about Johnson’s “Great Society” initiatives such as civil rights, Social Security and Medicare. The Supreme Court upheld abortion rights in 1973 and even Republican stalwart Richard Nixon pushed through sweeping environmental laws including the establishment of the EPA that same year. But the country eventually came together. Sure, many pockets of Americans did not like these measures but they did not demonize the proponents. Now, many Americans, particularly conservative Americans, feel like their way of life—the American way of life they remember from their childhood— is threatened and slowly being taken away. To them, gun control, abortion, equal rights, immigrants at the border, taking God out of school, gay marriage, the me-too movement, and many other cultural touchpoints are worth fighting against to their last breath. To them, collateral damage along the way is just that.

Finally, I think the biggest driver of discord and hatred is the rise of the Internet and social media after the turn of the century. Even worse than the cable news channels, social media makes no pretense at fact checking or ensuring the truth is told. Anybody with a conspiracy theory or outright lie they want broadly circulated will find their audience and it will be amplified to a degree unknown in the last century.

And when the lies and conspiracy theories come via social media from the highest levels of government, what are everyday Americans to do? It seems quaint now to suggest we turn off our phones or at least ignore the worst of the worst. But I hope you will join me in at least doing this one simple thing: do not forward or share anything that demonizes or insults the other side. What good does that do anyway? It only causes the other side to dig in more. Studies have shown that it is nearly impossible to change the minds of the other side once opinions have been formed and acted upon. It might make you feel good to share that snarky post but to me it is the height of laziness. If you want to get a point across, research it and write it yourself.

Oh, and you can also join me in turning off or at least limiting cable news viewership. There is no doubt they have a point of view, an agenda to support, and an axe to grind. And it’s also undeniably entertaining. But, please consider getting your entertainment elsewhere. You may not completely trust the network news and newspapers but they are undoubtedly a better choice than cable news. I know first-hand that both entities support highly stringent quality control measures, are bound by professional standards and ethics, hire highly educated professionals, and try to present both sides of every argument (as long as you avoid the editorials, which are clearly labeled, by the way.) And no doubt they sometime fail. But it’s not for lack of trying. These are simple steps we can all take to help make us better, kinder, more thoughtful citizens.

The Senate is Broken–You Can Blame Mitch McConnell

By Gary Bennett

The Capitol reflectred in a nearby pool.

As seen in the Frederick News-Post Monday, September 23, 2019

There is no shortage of important legislation the country wants, the Democrat-led House has passed (much with substantial bipartisan support), and the Republican-led Senate refuses to act on. At last count, 127 different bills are languishing in the hands of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell who has the absolute power to bring legislation to the floor of the Senate. Or not.

It’s the “or not” that has vexed Democrats and most Americans of both parties who want something done right now about many issues especially gun violence and election security. And it’s not even close.

In the case of gun violence, a recent NPR-PBS Newshour-Marist poll shows that 89% of Americans support enhanced background checks, including 84% of Republicans. Even the Republican lieutenant governor in ruby red Texas who boasts a 100% NRA rating says we must include private “stranger-to-stranger” gun sales in background checks. And, according to a Fox News poll, two-thirds of Americans support an assault weapons ban and nearly three-fourths support a national “red flag” law. That’s right – Fox News. If you are a gun-loving Republican who thinks nothing should be done about gun violence, you can be as stubborn as you want. Just know that you are now in the minority of your own party.

In the case of election security, a 2018 Cooperative Congressional Election Study found that over 75% of both Democrats and Republicans favor such measures as keeping a paper trail for each vote and performing a post-election audit even if it slows down results reporting. Whether you hold President Trump accountable or not, the Mueller Report makes it crystal clear, and politicians in both parties agree, that Russia most certainly meddled in the 2016 election and intends to do so again in 2020. And, individual states just don’t have the money or resources to combat this themselves.

So, how can Mitch McConnell be a one-man roadblock to the things Americans want? Very simply because he can. The Senate allows him to. The Senate majority leader holds astonishing power, none of which is laid out in the Constitution. Chief among these powers is the ability to set the agenda for the body, decide when it is in session, and decide which measures will be debated and voted on. One person decides all this and more. Whether by design or neglect the Founders did not address how the Senate would run itself or who would be in charge. Appointing leaders among Senate members and the power they wield has developed gradually and organically since about 1920.

Mr. McConnell has refused to take up House-passed legislation on hot-button issues because he says the president has not told him what bills he will support. This is a dangerous game to play with an erratic president who changes his position from one day to the next. Mr. McConnell’s stance precludes senators from debating and voting on legislation that is currently favored by most Americans and effectively transfers more power to the executive branch and away from Congress. This is not what the Founders wanted. Congress was always meant to be a co-equal branch, and even “first among equals” in the parlance of Thomas Jefferson.

To be fair, the Senate was always meant to be a calming influence on the House and the vagaries of shifting popular opinion. George Washington called it the “saucer that cools the tea.” The Founders provided that senators would stand for election every six years while representatives would stand every two years, making them more susceptible to short term swings in popular opinion while the Senate could afford to take the long view.

So, in one sense you can say that the Senate is doing exactly what it is supposed to do in regards to gun violence and election security. It is cooling the hot debate emanating from the House. But in another sense the Senate could just as effectively cool the tea by working with the House on compromise legislation and then bringing the legislation up for debate and subsequently voting it down if that is its desire. That is how it is supposed to work. But in this dysfunctional political climate in which we find ourselves, this is unlikely to happen. Many senators simply do not want an unpopular vote on their record. It is more politically expedient to simply not take up the issue. Mr. McConnell does not want to risk angering this mercurial president by forcing a veto and possible override.

This idea that you can’t consider legislation unless you know exactly how the president feels about it is a relatively new historical phenomenon and not a very attractive one. The president typically sets the broad national agenda and Congress attempts to follow it through legislative action. When you go back in history to the introduction of the Senate majority leader position in 1925 with Calvin Coolidge (R) in the White House, there have been 30 instances of the Senate majority leader belonging to the same party as the president. This did not stop Congress from doing its job and sending legislation to the president he might not like. According to the Congressional Record, in these 30 different Congresses, a total of 1,143 bills came to the president from a Senate controlled by the same party and were vetoed. Forty-four were overridden by Congress. Presumably the presidents didn’t like the 1,143 bills sent to them, but Congress sent them anyway. This is how our democracy is supposed to work. The president vetoed them as he had every right to do. But Congress overrode some of them, which is their right. Under the stewardship of Mitch McConnell, this Congressional right has been stopped in its tracks.

The majority leader has no constitutional right to withhold legislation from being considered. He has the right to do this by Senate rule and Senate rule alone. Those rules can be changed. Because he has taken political gamesmanship to a whole new level, it is hard to make the case that Mitch McConnell is still a patriot. He may have enjoyed that status at one time but no more. He is now derisively known as Moscow Mitch and clearly and unabashedly puts party over country just like when he said that he would do everything in his power to make sure Barack Obama was a one-term president even before he took office. While most political opponents wish a new president well, as was done with Mr. Trump, Mr. McConnell was proud to blindly sabotage Mr. Obama’s agenda whether it made sense for America or not.

All of us had the chance to vote for Mr. Trump or his opponent for president in 2016. Like it or not he is president now and has the constitutional right to shape foreign and domestic policy and represent all of us on the world stage. However, not many of us, and certainly no Maryland citizen, got a chance to vote for Mr. McConnell or his opponent in the 2014 Kentucky senatorial election. And we certainly have no voice on who the leaders of the Senate will be. Putting it into terms that Mr. McConnell will understand, his actions (or more precisely his lack of action) has made us disenfranchised voters, and as such we now have every right to meddle in the Kentucky Senate election in 2020.

Since Mr. McConnell is a leading proponent of money-is-free-speech, which helped introduce dark money into politics and all the vitriol that comes with it, I invite all Maryland citizens who feel that Mr. McConnell has abused his power, is ambivalent to the will of the people, and is kowtowing too much to this erratic president to join me and make a donation to the campaign of his 2020 Kentucky senatorial opponent, Amy McGrath (D), a former 20-year Marine Corps fighter pilot at https://amymcgrath.com/. Then we should write to our own senators asking that the Senate curtail the power of majority leader, no matter the party, starting with the next Congress in 2021 before this sad spectacle repeats itself. The Senate gave the majority leader this unfettered power and they can and should take it away. A better model to guide the activities of the Senate would be a panel of three senior senators from each party. Ties would be broken by the vice president. This would still give the majority party the upper hand but take such crucial decision making out of the hands of one person not elected by the vast majority of Americans.

All I Want for Labor Day is an Increase in the Federal Minimum Wage

By Gary Bennett

As seen in the Frederick News-Post Monday, September 2, 2019

Labor Day has been the poor step-sister of federal holidays for a while now. Most people know it as the defacto last day of summer – one last chance for a picnic and pool party. But it wasn’t always that way. The creation of Labor Day in the late 1800’s was a big deal and the logical result of the labor movement that paralleled the industrial revolution. It paid homage to the men and women who built this country.

There is no doubt that the country needed labor to be more assertive in the early days. The labor movement of the late 1800s addressed vexing issues such as extremely low pay, unsafe working conditions, 12- and 15-hour workdays, 7-day workweeks, and most harrowing of all, child labor. Because so much labor was needed to power the industrial revolution, workers soon gained the upper hand with management and did not shy away from demanding more money, less hours, and an end to child labor. The first strike was called by workers of the Pullman Palace Car Company in 1894 and was an unmitigated success for labor. Soon, strikes all over the country led to the end of child labor, increased wages, a 40-hour work week, and the advent of overtime pay. The old saying is absolutely true that if you enjoy your weekends, you have labor unions to thank.

But today, only about 10% of all workers are covered by unions. Most of us are “at will” employees, meaning we can be fired for any reason or no reason at all. There are many reasons for this shift including deregulation of many industries, technological advances, restructuring and plant closings, and the availability of more and better foreign goods. So, what would the founders of Labor Day and Grover Cleveland, the democratic president who signed it into law, think about the current state of relations between labor and management? I think they would be surprised that the pendulum has swung so far in the favor of management.

Nothing drives this point home as much as the debate over an increase in the federal minimum wage. With the passage of The Fair Labor Standards Act in 1938, the U.S. minimum wage was initially set at 25 cents per hour for covered workers. Since then, it has been raised 22 separate times, most recently in July 2009 to $7.25 an hour. The U.S. minimum wage has not been raised since 2009, the longest time the U.S. has gone without a minimum wage increase. It took a democrat in the White House and a democratic Congress in both houses to get this accomplished in 2009. It is also true that the federal minimum wage has not kept pace with inflation. Its peak was in 1968 when the minimum wage was $1.60 per hour. That is worth $11.39 in 2017 dollars. Since then, the minimum wage’s real value has been in decline.

On July 18 of this year, the Raise the Wage Act passed the U.S House of Representatives, a bill that would double the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour in increments by 2025. President Trump does not support this measure, and with the dynamics of the republican-led Senate being what they are, it is extremely unlikely it will be considered any time soon. But the measure is important politically as a precursor as to what could happen with a democratic president and Congress in 2021.

It is difficult to argue that all Americans should not be paid at least a living wage that will pull them out of poverty. The main argument against raising the federal minimum wage is the threat of job loss as labor becomes too expensive especially for small business. Putting aside the fact that federal minimum wage laws have always included exemptions for small business (I remember I made 90 cents per hour at a small local theater chain in 1979 when the federal minimum swage was $2.30), job loss has just not happened in an appreciable way over the long history of the minimum wage. A large body of research that looked at 138 minimum wage increases at the federal and state levels between 1979 and 2016 found they basically had no effect on low-wage jobs. More and more nonpartisan economists and business owners have increasingly accepted that some level of minimum wage can work well, coming at a minimal cost to jobs. Most importantly, most Americans, including republicans, support an increase in the minimum wage.

When you combine these facts with the estimation of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office that 1.3 million people will be lifted above the federal poverty level by 2025 with the $15 minimum wage, it is difficult to understand why we haven’t moved in this direction already. Political scorekeeping is one reason, of course, but another is the possibility that the same number – 1.3 million people – could lose their jobs. Past research is one thing, but the U.S. has never contemplated doubling the minimum wage is such a short period of time. The CBO acknowledges they are not sure what will happen, also saying that job loss could be zero. Nowhere in their analysis, however, do they talk about businesses failing because of paying an increased minimum wage. That position thrown about by politicians and pundits is pure hyperbole, has not happened in the past, and should not be believed by educated citizens.

Of course, most states have their own minimum wage laws. There is a strong argument to make that states are better equipped to set these wage floors because labor and job conditions from state to state vary so much. Five southern states have felt it unnecessary to set a state minimum wage at all – Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee and South Carolina – and have fought vociferously to end federal minimum wages protections. Two states – Wyoming and Georgia – have minimum wage rates below federal levels so they must adhere to the federal rate. Fourteen states have laws that set the minimum wage at the federal level. Twenty-nine states and the District of Columbia set their rates higher than the federal rate. Currently, Massachusetts and Washington state have the highest minimum wage rate at $11.00 per hour.

What about progressive Maryland? Earlier this year, Maryland became just the sixth state to raise the minimum wage to $15 per hour. Maryland’s current minimum wage is $10.10, and the new policy will gradually raise the wage floor to $15 by 2025. The law was passed by the General Assembly overriding the veto of Governor Hogan. The new law will benefit about 573,000 workers in Maryland who currently earn less than $15 – about 22% of the state’s workforce, according to the National Employment Law Project.

In my view an increase in the federal minimum wage is long overdue. An economy that has been growing steadily since our recovery from the Great Recession of 2008 should benefit everyone. When the economy grows and unemployment is low and labor is tight, wages should increase. That has not been the case. Hence, the debate rages over the wealth gap between rich and poor, white and black, immigrants and longer-term Americans, and management and labor.

A handy measuring stick for the wealth gap in 2019 is the CEO pay ratio, which many corporations now have to disclose as a public-owned company. It measures the compensation earned by “average workers” to their chief executive officer. Since it is so new, historical comparisons can’t be made. But the ratios are striking, ranging from 100-to-1 to sometimes topping 1,000-to-1 at companies like Walmart and McDonalds. You may argue that entry level-type jobs at these companies were meant to be just that – entry level – and not meant to last long term. I would argue these types of jobs are fast becoming the only types of jobs that can be found in a certain segment of our population in this outsourced, gig economy we find ourselves in.

The Peter Principal states that employees will rise in the hierarchy of a company or the economy in general until they reach a level of incompetence. Like it or not, we have to accept that for some people a job at Walmart or McDonald’s is the best they will do. Don’t they deserve a decent living wage? Free market capitalism just doesn’t do the job sometimes and needs a little help. I’ll go one step farther and say that companies that say they can’t afford to pay a living wage perhaps should not exist. And I say this as a small employer from earlier in my career who paid the federal minimum wage. Employers who pay low wages force their workers to turn to governmental safety programs at significant cost to taxpayers. Gradually phasing in a $15 minimum wage by 2025 would lift the pay of tens of millions of workers, reverse decades of growing pay inequity, bring new customers into markets they couldn’t afford until now, reduce costs associated with employee turnover, and lessen dependence on social safety nets. It’s time the Senate and president act.

What A Moderate Truly Believes

By Gary Bennett

As seen in the Frederick News-Post Thursday, August 6, 2019

With apologies to the Doobie Brothers who took What a Fool Believes to the top of the charts in 1979, here is what I believe moderates like me want. I’m not going to tell you what political persuasion I favor, but maybe you can guess by the end of this article. Hopefully not. The political fringes of both parties get all the attention, but I firmly believe that most Americans, largely silent Americans, fall somewhere in the middle.

As a moderate, I believe both sides get the benefit of the doubt until they abuse that privilege. How can they do that? By denigrating and demonizing the other side with a wild-eyed, foaming-at-the-mouth kind of glee. This is rampant today and gets us nowhere. Clearly there are patriots on both sides that care deeply about their country and fight ferociously for what they believe in. But unfortunately, there are also politicians, consultants, lobbyists, TV and radio personalities, and even ordinary Americans who see this as a big game that must have clear winners and losers. I hope we can start to aim higher than that and that moderates can lead the way. I’ll take a look at just three issues—gun safety, immigration, and health care policy.

Moderates do not want to take guns away from law-abiding citizens. Why would we? By definition, they are good people. I don’t see the attraction in guns, but then again I don’t see the attraction in kale and quinoa. But I have family and friends that enjoy guns immensely for sport and self defense, and that is fine. What moderates do want is sensible regulation of guns that brings ownership up to the same standards as automobiles—meaning licensing and registration. It also means closing gun show loopholes, universal criminal background checks, limiting new sales of assault weapons and other guns of war, and emergency confiscation of guns by family members of troubled individuals. Is that really too much to ask? I guess I’m asking responsible gun owners to take a small hit for the American people so there is a little less chance of random gun violence and saying unexpected, sorrowful goodbyes to loved ones. I believe the fact that the GOP-controlled Virginia legislature would not even discuss gun regulation during a recent special session called by the governor has sealed their fate in the next election. Moderates will put up with a lot of nonsense, but not dereliction of duty when people are dying.

Moderates believe in an immigration policy that meets migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers with kindness, not vitriol and hatred. It is the height of arrogance to deny or forget that we are all sons and daughters of immigrants that benefitted from open borders. There but for the grace of God go I. We don’t want open borders but we don’t think a wall is the answer either. We wish for the Statue of Liberty to remain the symbol of America, not a steel wall. We want orderly immigration that is administered by more judges. We want more aid to Latin American countries so that we tackle the problem at its origin, helping their citizens have a chance at a better life in their own country. Ask yourself how desperate people have to be to set off on a 1,000 mile trek with small children to an unfamiliar land with no promise of a better life at the end of it. Immigration is a vexing problem, but unsolvable? Of course not. We simply need to take the emotion out and demand our politicians meet in the middle.

Moderates believe that quality health care is a right for all and not a privilege for only those who can afford it. We also don’t believe that Medicare for All is the answer. Medicare and Medicaid are already underfunded and rife with abuse. It’s difficult to see how this could be sensibly financed and managed despite what the politicians say. Overall reform of our health care system is sorely needed. It does not work well for many of us. Obamacare, while not perfect, was a step in the right direction. Threats to repeal Obamacare, with nothing in the works to replace it, are irresponsible. Most Americans seem to sense this, yet the threats continue.

For all issues, moderates want our best minds to come together and, in the best case, reach consensus or, if need be, compromise. We are tired of all the rancor and political scorekeeping. Words are cheap. Reasonable politicians who can show the level of maturity needed to build consensus and reach compromise should get our vote no matter the party affiliation. It won’t just happen. The message has to come loud and clear at the ballot box. Please join me in telling the two political fringes that we’ve had enough. This won’t be easy but as John Lennon said, “You may say I’m a dreamer, but I’m not the only one.” Search out candidates who don’t spout the party line automatically and don’t seem to have all the answers already but show thoughtfulness and a willingness to learn.

And one final thought–if you think your side is always right and the other side is always wrong, I congratulate you for having life figured out better than the rest of us. The freedom this affords must be quite satisfying. But just consider for a moment all the damage you are doing if you really are wrong after all.